Wikipedia vandalism detection: combining natural language, metadata, and reputation features

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia which anyone can edit. While most edits are constructive, about 7% are acts of vandalism. Such behavior is characterized by modifications made in bad faith; introducing spam and other inappropriate content. In this work, we present the results of an effort to integrate three of the leading approaches to Wikipedia vandalism detection: a spatio-temporal analysis of metadata (STiki), a reputation-based system (WikiTrust), and natural language processing features. The performance of the resulting joint system improves the state-of-the-art from all previous methods and establishes a new baseline for Wikipedia vandalism detection. We examine in detail the contribution of the three approaches, both for the task of discovering fresh vandalism, and for the task of locating vandalism in the complete set of Wikipedia revisions.The authors from Universitat Politècnica de València thank also the MICINN research project TEXT-ENTERPRISE 2.0 TIN2009-13391-C04-03 (Plan I+D+i). UPenn contributions were supported in part by ONR MURI N00014-07-1-0907. This research was partially supported by award 1R01GM089820-01A1 from the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences, and by ISSDM, a UCSC-LANL educational collaboration.Adler, BT.; Alfaro, LD.; Mola Velasco, SM.; Rosso, P.; West, AG. (2011). Wikipedia vandalism detection: combining natural language, metadata, and reputation features. En Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. Springer Verlag (Germany). 6609:277-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19437-5_23S2772886609Wikimedia Foundation: Wikipedia (2010) [Online; accessed December 29, 2010]Wikimedia Foundation: Wikistats (2010) [Online; accessed December 29, 2010]Potthast, M.: Crowdsourcing a Wikipedia Vandalism Corpus. In: Proc. of the 33rd Intl. ACM SIGIR Conf. (SIGIR 2010). ACM Press, New York (July 2010)Gralla, P.: U.S. senator: It’s time to ban Wikipedia in schools, libraries, http://blogs.computerworld.com/4598/u_s_senator_its_time_to_ban_wikipedia_in_schools_libraries [Online; accessed November 15, 2010]Olanoff, L.: School officials unite in banning Wikipedia. Seattle Times (November 2007)Mola-Velasco, S.M.: Wikipedia Vandalism Detection Through Machine Learning: Feature Review and New Proposals. In: Braschler, M., Harman, D. (eds.) Notebook Papers of CLEF 2010 LABs and Workshops, Padua, Italy, September 22-23 (2010)Adler, B., de Alfaro, L., Pye, I.: Detecting Wikipedia Vandalism using WikiTrust. In: Braschler, M., Harman, D. (eds.) Notebook Papers of CLEF 2010 LABs and Workshops, Padua, Italy, September 22-23 (2010)West, A.G., Kannan, S., Lee, I.: Detecting Wikipedia Vandalism via Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Revision Metadata. In: EUROSEC 2010: Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on System Security, pp. 22–28 (2010)West, A.G.: STiki: A Vandalism Detection Tool for Wikipedia (2010), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STikiWikipedia: User: AntiVandalBot – Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AntiVandalBot (2010) [Online; accessed November 2, 2010]Wikipedia: User:MartinBot – Wikipedia (2010), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MartinBot [Online; accessed November 2, 2010]Wikipedia: User:ClueBot – Wikipedia (2010), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ClueBot [Online; accessed November 2, 2010]Carter, J.: ClueBot and Vandalism on Wikipedia (2008), http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/~carter11/ClueBot.pdf [Online; accessed November 2, 2010]Rodríguez Posada, E.J.: AVBOT: detección y corrección de vandalismos en Wikipedia. NovATIca (203), 51–53 (2010)Potthast, M., Stein, B., Gerling, R.: Automatic Vandalism Detection in Wikipedia. In: Macdonald, C., Ounis, I., Plachouras, V., Ruthven, I., White, R.W. (eds.) ECIR 2008. LNCS, vol. 4956, pp. 663–668. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Smets, K., Goethals, B., Verdonk, B.: Automatic Vandalism Detection in Wikipedia: Towards a Machine Learning Approach. In: WikiAI 2008: Proceedings of the Workshop on Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence: An Evolving Synergy, pp. 43–48. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)Druck, G., Miklau, G., McCallum, A.: Learning to Predict the Quality of Contributions to Wikipedia. In: WikiAI 2008: Proceedings of the Workshop on Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence: An Evolving Synergy, pp. 7–12. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)Itakura, K.Y., Clarke, C.L.: Using Dynamic Markov Compression to Detect Vandalism in the Wikipedia. In: SIGIR 2009: Proc. of the 32nd Intl. ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 822–823 (2009)Chin, S.C., Street, W.N., Srinivasan, P., Eichmann, D.: Detecting Wikipedia Vandalism with Active Learning and Statistical Language Models. In: WICOW 2010: Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web (April 2010)Zeng, H., Alhoussaini, M., Ding, L., Fikes, R., McGuinness, D.: Computing Trust from Revision History. In: Intl. Conf. on Privacy, Security and Trust (2006)McGuinness, D., Zeng, H., da Silva, P., Ding, L., Narayanan, D., Bhaowal, M.: Investigation into Trust for Collaborative Information Repositories: A Wikipedia Case Study. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Models of Trust for the Web (2006)Adler, B., de Alfaro, L.: A Content-Driven Reputation System for the Wikipedia. In: WWW 2007: Proceedings of the 16th International World Wide Web Conference. ACM Press, New York (2007)Belani, A.: Vandalism Detection in Wikipedia: a Bag-of-Words Classifier Approach. Computing Research Repository (CoRR) abs/1001.0700 (2010)Potthast, M., Stein, B., Holfeld, T.: Overview of the 1st International Competition on Wikipedia Vandalism Detection. In: Braschler, M., Harman, D. (eds.) Notebook Papers of CLEF 2010 LABs and Workshops, Padua, Italy, September 22-23 (2010)Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.: The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1) (2009)Breiman, L.: Random Forests. Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32 (2001)Davis, J., Goadrich, M.: The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves. In: ICML 2006: Proc. of the 23rd Intl. Conf. on Machine Learning (2006

A Decade of Shared Tasks in Digital Text Forensics at PAN

[EN] Digital text forensics aims at examining the originality and credibility of information in electronic documents and, in this regard, to extract and analyze information about the authors of these documents. The research field has been substantially developed during the last decade. PAN is a series of shared tasks that started in 2009 and significantly contributed to attract the attention of the research community in well-defined digital text forensics tasks. Several benchmark datasets have been developed to assess the state-of-the-art performance in a wide range of tasks. In this paper, we present the evolution of both the examined tasks and the developed datasets during the last decade. We also briefly introduce the upcoming PAN 2019 shared tasks.We are indebted to many colleagues and friends who contributed greatly to PAN's tasks: Maik Anderka, Shlomo Argamon, Alberto Barrón-Cedeño, Fabio Celli, Fabio Crestani, Walter Daelemans, Andreas Eiselt, Tim Gollub, Parth Gupta, Matthias Hagen, Teresa Holfeld, Patrick Juola, Giacomo Inches, Mike Kestemont, Moshe Koppel, Manuel Montes-y-Gómez, Aurelio Lopez-Lopez, Francisco Rangel, Miguel Angel Sánchez-Pérez, Günther Specht, Michael Tschuggnall, and Ben Verhoeven. Our special thanks go to PAN¿s sponsors throughout the years and not least to the hundreds of participants.Potthast, M.; Rosso, P.; Stamatatos, E.; Stein, B. (2019). A Decade of Shared Tasks in Digital Text Forensics at PAN. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 11438:291-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15719-7_39S2913001143

PAN@FIRE: Overview of the cross-language !ndian Text re-use detection competition

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40087-2_6The development of models for automatic detection of text re-use and plagiarism across languages has received increasing attention in recent years. However, the lack of an evaluation framework composed of annotated datasets has caused these efforts to be isolated. In this paper we present the CL!TR 2011 corpus, the first manually created corpus for the analysis of cross-language text re-use between English and Hindi. The corpus was used during the Cross-Language !ndian Text Re-Use Detection Competition. Here we overview the approaches applied the contestants and evaluate their quality when detecting a re-used text together with its source.This research work is partially funded by the WIQ-EI (IRSES grant n. 269180)and ACCURAT (grant n. 248347) projects, and the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n. 246016 from the European Union. The first author was partially funded by the CONACyT-Mexico 192021 grant and currently works under the ERCIM “Alain Bensoussan” Fellowship Programme. The research of the second author is in the framework of the VLC/Campus Microcluster on Multimodal Interaction in Intelligent Systems and partially funded by the MICINN research project TEXT-ENTERPRISE 2.0 TIN2009-13391-C04-03 (plan I+D+i). The research from AU-KBC Centre is supported by the Cross Lingual Information Access (CLIA) Phase II Project.Barrón Cedeño, LA.; Rosso ., P.; Sobha, LD.; Clough ., P.; Stevenson ., M. (2013). PAN@FIRE: Overview of the cross-language !ndian Text re-use detection competition. En Multilingual Information Access in South Asian Languages. Springer Verlag (Germany). 7536:59-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40087-2_6S59707536Addanki, K., Wu, D.: An Evaluation of MT Alignment Baseline Approaches upon Cross-Lingual Plagiarism Detection. In: FIRE [12]Aggarwal, N., Asooja, K., Buitelaar, P.: Cross Lingual Text Reuse Detection Using Machine Translation & Similarity Measures. In: FIRE [12]Alegria, I., Forcada, M., Sarasola, K. (eds.): Proceedings of the SEPLN 2009 Workshop on Information Retrieval and Information Extraction for Less Resourced Languages. University of the Basque Country, Donostia, Donostia (2009)Barrón-Cedeño, A., Rosso, P., Pinto, D., Juan, A.: On Cross-Lingual Plagiarism Analysis Using a Statistical Model. In: Stein, B., Stamatatos, E., Koppel, M. (eds.) ECAI 2008 Workshop on Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship, and Social Software Misuse (PAN 2008), vol. 377, pp. 9–13. CEUR-WS.org, Patras (2008), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-377Bendersky, M., Croft, W.: Finding Text Reuse on the Web. In: Baeza-Yates, R., Boldi, P., Ribeiro-Neto, B., Cambazoglu, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, pp. 262–271. ACM, Barcelona (2009)Ceska, Z., Toman, M., Jezek, K.: Multilingual Plagiarism Detection. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI 2008), pp. 83–92. Springer, Varna (2008)Clough, P.: Plagiarism in Natural and Programming Languages: an Overview of Current Tools and Technologies. Research Memoranda: CS-00-05, Department of Computer Science. University of Sheffield, UK (2000)Clough, P.: Old and new challenges in automatic plagiarism detection. National UK Plagiarism Advisory Service (2003), http://ir.shef.ac.uk/cloughie/papers/pasplagiarism.pdfClough, P., Gaizauskas, R.: Corpora and Text Re-Use. In: Lüdeling, A., Kytö, M., McEnery, T. (eds.) Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, pp. 1249–1271. Mouton de Gruyter (2009)Clough, P., Stevenson, M.: Developing a Corpus of Plagiarised Examples. Language Resources and Evaluation 45(1), 5–24 (2011)Comas, R., Sureda, J.: Academic Cyberplagiarism: Tracing the Causes to Reach Solutions. In: Comas, R., Sureda, J. (eds.) Academic Cyberplagiarism [online dossier], Digithum. Iss, vol. 10, pp. 1–6. UOC (2008), http://bit.ly/cyberplagiarism_csMajumder, P., Mitra, M., Bhattacharyya, P., Subramaniam, L., Contractor, D., Rosso, P. (eds.): FIRE 2010 and 2011. LNCS, vol. 7536. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Gale, W., Church, K.: A Program for Aligning Sentences in Bilingual Corpora. Computational Linguistics 19, 75–102 (1993)Ghosh, A., Bhaskar, P., Pal, S., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Rule Based Plagiarism Detection using Information Retrieval. In: Petras, et al. [24]Gupta, P., Singhal, K.: Mapping Hindi-English Text Re-use Document Pairs. In: FIRE [12]Head, A.: How today’s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday 15(3) (March 2010), http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2830/2476IEEE: A Plagiarism FAQ (2008), http://bit.ly/ieee_plagiarism (published: 2008; accessed March 3, 2010)Kulathuramaiyer, N., Maurer, H.: Coping With the Copy-Paste-Syndrome. In: Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (E-Learn 2007), pp. 1072–1079. AACE, Quebec City (2007)Lee, C., Wu, C., Yang, H.: A Platform Framework for Cross-lingual Text Relatedness Evaluation and Plagiarism Detection. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Innovative Computing Information (ICICIC 2008). IEEE Computer Society (2008)Martínez, I.: Wikipedia Usage by Mexican Students. The Constant Usage of Copy and Paste. In: Wikimania 2009, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2009), http://wikimania2009.wikimedia.orgMaurer, H., Kappe, F., Zaka, B.: Plagiarism - a survey. Journal of Universal Computer Science 12(8), 1050–1084 (2006)Palkovskii, Y., Belov, A.: Exploring Cross Lingual Plagiarism Detection in Hindi-English with n-gram Fingerprinting and VSM based Similarity Detection. In: FIRE [12]Palkovskii, Y., Belov, A., Muzika, I.: Using WordNet-based Semantic Similarity Measurement in External Plagiarism Detection - Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2011. In: Petras, et al. [24]Petras, V., Forner, P., Clough, P. (eds.): Notebook Papers of CLEF 2011 LABs and Workshops, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (September 2011)Potthast, M., Stein, B., Eiselt, A., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Rosso, P.: Overview of the 1st international competition on plagiarism detection. In: Stein, B., Rosso, P., Stamatatos, E., Koppel, M., Agirre, E. (eds.) SEPLN 2009 Workshop on Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship, and Social Software Misuse (PAN 2009), vol. 502, pp. 1–9. CEUR-WS.org, San Sebastian (2009), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-502Potthast, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Stein, B., Rosso, P.: Cross-Language Plagiarism Detection. Language Resources and Evaluation (LRE), Special Issue on Plagiarism and Authorship Analysis 45(1), 1–18 (2011)Potthast, M., Eiselt, A., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Stein, B., Rosso, P.: Overview of the 3rd International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. In: Petras, et al. [24]Potthast, M., Stein, B., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Rosso, P.: An Evaluation Framework for Plagiarism Detection. In: Huang, C.R., Jurafsky, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2010), pp. 997–1005. COLING 2010 Organizing Committee, Beijing (2010)Potthast, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Eiselt, A., Stein, B., Rosso, P.: Overview of the 2nd International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. In: Braschler, M., Harman, D. (eds.) Notebook Papers of CLEF 2010 LABs and Workshops, Padua, Italy (September 2010)Rambhoopal, K., Varma, V.: Cross-Lingual Text Reuse Detection Based On Keyphrase Extraction and Similarity Measures. In: FIRE [12]Weber, S.: Das Google-Copy-Paste-Syndrom. Wie Netzplagiate Ausbildung und Wissen gefahrden. Telepolis (2007

Retention and generalizability of balance recovery response adaptations from trip-perturbations across the adult lifespan

For human locomotion, varying environments require adjustments of the motor system. We asked whether age affects gait balance recovery adaptation, its retention over months and the transfer of adaptation to an untrained reactive balance task. Healthy adults (26 young, 27 middle-aged and 25 older; average ages 24, 52 and 72 years respectively) completed two tasks. The primary task involved treadmill walking: either unperturbed (control; n=39) or subject to unexpected trip perturbations (training; n=39). A single trip perturbation was repeated after a 14-week retention period. The secondary transfer task, before and after treadmill walking, involved sudden loss of balance in a lean-and-release protocol. For both tasks the anteroposterior margin of stability (MoS) was calculated at foot touchdown. For the first (i.e. novel) trip, older adults required one more recovery step ( P=0.03) to regain positive MoS compared to younger, but not middle-aged, adults. However, over several trip perturbations, all age groups increased their MoS for the first recovery step to a similar extent (up to 70%), and retained improvements over 14 weeks, though a decay over time was found for older adults ( P=0.002; middle-aged showing a tendency for decay: P=0.076). Thus, although adaptability in reactive gait stability control remains effective across the adult lifespan, retention of adaptations over time appears diminished with aging. Despite these robust adaptations, the perturbation training group did not show superior improvements in the transfer task compared to aged-matched controls (no differences in MoS changes), suggesting that generalizability of acquired fall-resisting skills from gait-perturbation training may be limited

Fault tree analysis for system modeling in case of intentional EMI

The complexity of modern systems on the one hand and the rising threat of intentional electromagnetic interference (IEMI) on the other hand increase the necessity for systematical risk analysis. Most of the problems can not be treated deterministically since slight changes in the configuration (source, position, polarization, ...) can dramatically change the outcome of an event. For that purpose, methods known from probabilistic risk analysis can be applied. One of the most common approaches is the fault tree analysis (FTA). The FTA is used to determine the system failure probability and also the main contributors to its failure. In this paper the fault tree analysis is introduced and a possible application of that method is shown using a small computer network as an example. The constraints of this methods are explained and conclusions for further research are drawn

Overview of the 3rd international competition on plagiarism detection

This paper overviews eleven plagiarism detectors that have been developed and evaluated within PAN'11. We survey the detection approaches developed for the two sub-tasks "external plagiarism detection" and "intrinsic plagiarism detection," and we report on their detailed evaluation based on the third revised edition of the PAN plagiarism corpus PAN-PC-11

Overview of the 2nd international competition on plagiarism detection

This paper overviews 18 plagiarism detectors that have been developed and evaluated within PAN'10. We start with a unified retrieval process that summarizes the best practices employed this year. Then, the detectors' performances are evaluated in detail, highlighting several important aspects of plagiarism detection, such as obfuscation, intrinsic vs. external plagiarism, and plagiarism case length. Finally, all results are compared to those of last year's competition

Overview of the 1st international competition on plagiarism detection

The 1st International Competition on Plagiarism Detection, held in conjunction with the 3rd PAN workshop on Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship, and Social Software Misuse, brought together researchers from many disciplines around the exciting retrieval task of automatic plagiarism detection. The competition was divided into the subtasks external plagiarism detection and intrinsic plagiarism detection, which were tackled by 13 participating groups. An important by-product of the competition is an evaluation framework for plagiarism detection, which consists of a large-scale plagiarism corpus and detection quality measures. The framework may serve as a unified test environment to compare future plagiarism detection research. In this paper we describe the corpus design and the quality measures, survey the detection approaches developed by the participants, and compile the achieved performance results of the competitors

A Comparison of Approaches for Measuring Cross-Lingual Similarity of Wikipedia Articles

Wikipedia has been used as a source of comparable texts for a range of tasks, such as Statistical Machine Translation and CrossLanguage Information Retrieval. Articles written in different languages on the same topic are often connected through inter-language-links. However, the extent to which these articles are similar is highly variable and this may impact on the use of Wikipedia as a comparable resource. In this paper we compare various language-independent methods for measuring cross-lingual similarity: character n-grams, cognateness, word count ratio, and an approach based on outlinks. These approaches are compared against a baseline utilising MT resources. Measures are also compared to human judgements of similarity using a manually created resource containing 700 pairs of Wikipedia articles (in 7 language pairs). Results indicate that a combination of language-independent models (char-ngrams, outlinks and word-count ratio) is highly effective for identifying cross-lingual similarity and performs comparably to language-dependent models (translation and monolingual analysis).The work of the first author was in the framework of the Tacardi research project (TIN2012-38523-C02-00). The work of the fourth author was in the framework of the DIANA-Applications (TIN2012-38603-C02-01) and WIQ-EI IRSES (FP7 Marie Curie No. 269180) research projects.Barrón Cedeño, LA.; Paramita, ML.; Clough, P.; Rosso, P. (2014). A Comparison of Approaches for Measuring Cross-Lingual Similarity of Wikipedia Articles. En Advances in Information Retrieval. Springer Verlag (Germany). 424-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06028-6_36S424429Adafre, S., de Rijke, M.: Finding Similar Sentences across Multiple Languages in Wikipedia. In: Proc. of the 11th Conf. of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 62–69 (2006)Dumais, S., Letsche, T., Littman, M., Landauer, T.: Automatic Cross-Language Retrieval Using Latent Semantic Indexing. In: AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium Series: Cross-Language Text and Speech Retrieval, Stanford University, pp. 24–26 (1997)Filatova, E.: Directions for exploiting asymmetries in multilingual Wikipedia. In: Proc. of the Third Intl. Workshop on Cross Lingual Information Access: Addressing the Information Need of Multilingual Societies, Boulder, CO (2009)Levow, G.A., Oard, D., Resnik, P.: Dictionary-Based Techniques for Cross-Language Information Retrieval. Information Processing and Management: Special Issue on Cross-Language Information Retrieval 41(3), 523–547 (2005)Mcnamee, P., Mayfield, J.: Character N-Gram Tokenization for European Language Text Retrieval. Information Retrieval 7(1-2), 73–97 (2004)Mihalcea, R.: Using Wikipedia for Automatic Word Sense Disambiguation. In: Proc. of NAACL 2007. ACL, Rochester (2007)Mohammadi, M., GhasemAghaee, N.: Building Bilingual Parallel Corpora based on Wikipedia. In: Second Intl. Conf. on Computer Engineering and Applications., vol. 2, pp. 264–268 (2010)Munteanu, D., Fraser, A., Marcu, D.: Improved Machine Translation Performace via Parallel Sentence Extraction from Comparable Corpora. In: Proc. of the Human Language Technology and North American Association for Computational Linguistics Conf (HLT/NAACL 2004), Boston, MA (2004)Nguyen, D., Overwijk, A., Hauff, C., Trieschnigg, D.R.B., Hiemstra, D., de Jong, F.: WikiTranslate: Query Translation for Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval Using Only Wikipedia. In: Peters, C., Deselaers, T., Ferro, N., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kurimo, M., Mandl, T., Peñas, A., Petras, V. (eds.) CLEF 2008. LNCS, vol. 5706, pp. 58–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Paramita, M.L., Clough, P.D., Aker, A., Gaizauskas, R.: Correlation between Similarity Measures for Inter-Language Linked Wikipedia Articles. In: Calzolari, E.A. (ed.) Proc. of the 8th Intl. Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), pp. 790–797. ELRA, Istanbul (2012)Potthast, M., Stein, B., Anderka, M.: A Wikipedia-Based Multilingual Retrieval Model. In: Macdonald, C., Ounis, I., Plachouras, V., Ruthven, I., White, R.W. (eds.) ECIR 2008. LNCS, vol. 4956, pp. 522–530. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Simard, M., Foster, G.F., Isabelle, P.: Using Cognates to Align Sentences in Bilingual Corpora. In: Proc. of the Fourth Intl. Conf. on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation (1992)Steinberger, R., Pouliquen, B., Hagman, J.: Cross-lingual Document Similarity Calculation Using the Multilingual Thesaurus EUROVOC. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2002. LNCS, vol. 2276, pp. 415–424. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Toral, A., Muñoz, R.: A proposal to automatically build and maintain gazetteers for Named Entity Recognition using Wikipedia. In: Proc. of the EACL Workshop on New Text 2006. Association for Computational Linguistics, Trento (2006